gengarfluid:

only-tiktoks:

Transcript:

“I get a lotta comments like this dumb one up here, and normally, I would just ignore them, because it’s a dumb comment; it’s tired; it’s old; but today, I’m gonna learn ya somethin’.”

“Not only is there tons of historical evidence through art showing Black people wearing aristocratic fashion, but there’s also tons of evidence showing them as equals to their White counterparts. Now let’s talk about a specific painting.”

“This painting is called Young Woman With a Servant; it’s painted by Stephen Slaughter in the late 17th or 18th century. This painting right here has caused an uproar in the art history community. For one, you hear the title "Young Woman with a Servant,” you think: this is the young woman, and this is the servant. But! That’s not the case.“

"Many art historians argue that this is the young woman and this is the servant. For one: that’s not a young woman. Two: this woman that’s standing has all the jewels. Many jewels around her neck, many jewels around her ears. … ”around her ears…“ The frog buttons on her bodice suggest that this is a riding outfit; servants didn’t go riding, that’s a rich person thing. Woman sitting down - less jewelry, nothing on her neck, and! Here’s the big thing! She’s looking off into the distance, while the standing woman is looking straight at the artist.”

“Usually, the person looking off into the distance is of less importance because it’s less personable: they’re not looking you right in the eye. Another thing: while the woman standing is the one picking the fruit, the woman sitting down is the one holding it, holding the bag, carrying it all, carrying the load.”

“If you wanna see more examples of Black people not being servants and slaves in art history, please check out "Black aristocratic art” (I hope I said that word right because I always said it wrong in school).“

"So now: to be historically accurate, I do not need to be wearing slave clothes. Thank you, thank you for coming to my TedTalk, buh-bye.”

(via percivald3rolo)

anotherdayforchaosfay:

charlieleelee:

froody:

a-daks:

a-daks:

froody:

When I was a kid, my dad hated when I hung up anything on my walls. My art, band posters, movie posters, anything. Not with taxks, not with tape (it “ripped the paint off”) not with anything. At one point in 5th or 6th grade he came in my room and found me hanging up a Diary of a Wimpy Kid poster with tacos and he was like “EVERY HOLE YOU PUT IN THE WALL TAKES $10 OFF THE VALUE OF THE HOUSE.” so when I was mad at him, I’d insert tacks into the wall in places he couldn’t easily see just out of spite. Whoever owns the house now is probably wondering about it.

bro didn’t even know you could just fill holes with toothpaste 💀

I know this is about an owned house (that you should be touching up and repainting the walls of before reselling anyway???) but for ppl who are paranoid about putting holes in rental walls: don’t be.
Put up posters. Shelving if you need it. Have hanging plants. Invest in a studfinder. Spackle kits are cheap and everywhere now, or you can use white toothpaste, glue, or even soft air-dry clay to fill holes.
Scuffs and rub marks are considered normal wear and tear and landlords can’t charge you for them. Most places will have you fill holes but will have to repaint between tenants anyway, so even if the spackle doesn’t match the walls, it’s not a big deal. Check your state laws about what is considered normal wear and tear. Most states have laws covering everything from paint to flooring. For instance, in my state, carpet that is 3+ years old is considered past its normal life cycle and therefore any damage to it cannot be charged for because the landlord/management is expected to put in new carpeting.

Before any move-out, check local laws considering paint, flooring, light fixtures, appliances, etc. Landlords and management companies make BANK on people not knowing that they’re paying for paint rubs that they’re painting over anyway and carpet that has been paid for 6 times over.

Reminder: they’re never ever ever ever going to give you your security deposit back no matter what you do. have fun with life.

Actually, if your landlord isn’t giving your security deposit back without good reason (in new york, they gave to give you a itemized receipt listing why they deducted from it) bring them to small claims court. Don’t let the bloodsuckers get away with your money.

Our last landlord tried keeping all the deposit and charging is for more. When we moved in, I took a whole lotta pictures. I took pics when we moved out and did my research regarding local laws and looked at how frequently tenants win in small claims court here. Over 80% of cases are in favor of tenants.

So I wrote a very professional letter to the landlord and property management company. I provided this information and sent a CD with copies of before and after pics of the place with notes, like the place hadn’t been cleaned before we moved in, there was a hole from the second bathroom to the outside, large enough to fit a fat raccoon, husky fur everywhere, nails, hooks, and tacks in the walls, footprints on the ceiling, human hair on the walls and ceilings of the main bathroom.

I informed them they had 60 days to return our deposit or we will take them to small claims court. Local laws state that if a tenant wins, we receive 3x the deposit, and the landlord pays all court costs and fees. 58 days after sending the letter, we received our deposit with an apology for “confusion.”

These people are dependent on ignorance. Be aware, be knowledgeable, and make them afraid.

(via weissflower)

weaver-z:

weaver-z:

weaver-z:

Four extremely heterosexual-looking men are walking around in the LGBT section of my local coffee shop/book store. Much to watch.

One of them picked up Dykes to Watch Out For and said “Woah! Lesbians…” out loud

image

(via weissflower)

bisclavaret:

image
image
image

a day late to my 6 years on t anniversary ✨🏳️‍⚧️ a short comic about looking back

(via weissflower)

cyberpunkboytoy:

kokoinupi:

thegreatyin:

found a twitter tweet that was like “oh yeah content warning hatoful boyfriend has a lot of gore and violence” and every single person in the notes/retweets/qrts/whatever the fuck terms twitter has was going “WHAT THE FUCK IT HAS WHAT” and i find that hilarious because. large amounts of gore and violence is a tremendous understatement about the amount of stuff that goes down in hatoful boyfriend

my full trigger list for hatoful boyfriend (and its sequel), for anyone curious is:

  • war and genocide
  • suicide (including coerced suicide)
  • murder (including decapitation and dismemberment)
  • cannibalism
  • guns
  • terminal illness and biological weaponry
  • persuing monster-based horror
  • unreality
  • scientific experimentation-based horror
  • racism
  • childhood trauma and parent death
  • infanticide (or more accurately, bird abortion)
  • emotional manipulation
  • unhealthy/codependent relationships
  • death of a romantic interest
  • twisted morality and gray morality
  • general heartbreakery

just on the off chance anyone reading this doesn’t know what Hatoful Boyfriend is

image

(via emberandcelica)

roadhogsbigbelly:

roadhogsbigbelly:

roadhogsbigbelly:

i love fat and hairy gay men and their armpits, but i also seeing posts from lesbians and other queer women about how much they love fat and hairy women and their armpits. that’s really fucking epic honestly.

i love bears and butches. they should unionize.

image
image

i know this is really dumb and cheesy but this is one of my favorite posts because seeing someone be like “sorry to derail but i’m a lesbian that thinks beefy fat female characters are hot :(” is like. no. don’t apologize. that’s really fucking cool.

(via weissflower)

pika-memes:

image

(via cav-core)

sylveondreams:

vanilla-kitty:

luckymewciano:

luckymewciano:

image
image
image
image
image
image
image

One of my favorite genres of post

image
image

i gotta show yall a our discord classic

image

(via galiifreyrose)

aromanticduck:

Things that would fix the internet immediately:

  1. Bring back Club Penguin for the kids
  2. Create a separate Club Penguin for adults which is exactly the same except you’re allowed to swear

(via dingdongyouarewrong)

identitty-dickruption:

identitty-dickruption:

there’s no shame in needing to pause a physical activity to go get a glass of water. yes, this includes fucking

actually. happy disability pride month to any of my fellow disabled people who fuck different. who need to take sex slowly. who need to use an inhaler during sex. who need a wrist massage before or after sex. you’re epic, and you deserve to have your body rocked this disability pride month

(via sobbing-space-trash)

sqwick:

sqwick:

sqwick:

sqwick:

Anime studios need to strike next

Down with seasonal anime down with overconsumption down with every series regardless of how complex needing to be boiled down to fit into 12 episodes

there’s just too many shows

too many shows and they’re coming out at such an unprecedented rate that we can’t even fully appreciate them. and I KNOW that people are slaving away in unethical work conditions to make them, all so that nobody can even remember them, no matter how lovingly crafted or beautiful they really are

(via galiifreyrose)

playingsegawithharrisonford:

kawuli:

aqueerkettleofish:

#i know people have started criticizing the#‘men are afraid of getting laughed at women are afraid of getting killed’#but this is real?

Oh, yes.

A few years ago I went to pick up a woman I met on OKCupid for a date, and a friend of hers was there. They kind of over-explained “Oh, she just showed up to say hi” and there was a vague nervousness in the air that even my autistic ass was picking up on. Her friend was playing conspicuously with her phone. I went “Ah, the safety. Need to get a picture?”

Dead silence for about a second and a half, then the friend took a picture, looked at my date, and said “Have fun” and walked out the door.

(I would ordinarily have been clueless, but I’d just been asked to be the safety the previous night.)

My advice to male-presenting folks: recognize that this not your problem. By which I mean, this sort of security check isn’t a problem for you. It doesn’t hurt you. You aren’t being insulted or disrespected. And if you treat it like what it is– a reasonable adaptation to an unreasonable situation– and just roll with it, your dates will be more comfortable, and you will have a better time as a result.

The same applies to phone calls mid-date. Let them answer the damn phone without drama.

They aren’t accusing you of being a dangerous person. The very fact that they are willing to go on a goddamn date with you means that they have extended a certain level of trust. But the fact remains that there isn’t really a way to distinguish between “a man who isn’t dangerous” and “a man who knows how to behave like he’s not dangerous.”

there isn’t really a way to distinguish between “a man who isn’t dangerous” and “a man who knows how to behave like he’s not dangerous.”

Fun fact - if you flip out, make a big deal, act insulted, go on a rant, or whatever about these kinds of safety measures, you’ve just proven that you are the sort of person that those safety measures are needed for.

(via galiifreyrose)

aliciameade:

dankmemeuniversity:

image

Tumblr’s stupid dash placeholder really elevated this post.

image

(via verypurplepenguins)

homoluigi:

image

(via galiifreyrose)

jechristine:

image
image

(via ali3nboyfriend)